Fiona Crawley vs Madison Sieg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 19 Jun at 04:24 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Crawley vs M. Sieg

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crawley 1 - 0 Sieg
They have played 3 sets in total, with Fiona Crawley winning 2 and Madison Sieg winning 1. The last match between Fiona Crawley and Madison Sieg was at the W35 Wichita, 19-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Fiona Crawley getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crawley | 1 |
| Sieg | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Wichita(06-19-25)
F. Crawley vs M. Sieg H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $138,700 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 67.48% (83-40) | Career Total W/L | 53.30% (121-106) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
F. Crawley vs M. Sieg Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows Sieg winning 39.74% of points, slightly higher than Crawley's 36.93%. Could this small edge make the difference?
- When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Crawley leads with 55.35% success compared to Sieg's 49.74%. Will Crawley capitalize on this advantage?
- In first serve return points, Crawley also comes out ahead, securing 37.27% over Sieg’s 34.62%.
- Both players are almost equally effective in saving breakpoints; Sieg saves 46.32% while Crawley saves 46.1%.
- Over the last year, Crawley has the edge in match wins, with a 58.54% win ratio versus Sieg’s 46.15%.
- Sieg performs best on indoor hard courts with a 55% win rate, while Crawley shines on hard courts, winning 73% of matches.
- Both players have primarily contested in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K; Crawley has a slight edge with a 57.89% win rate compared to Sieg's 46.15%.
- Sieg faced slightly stronger competition, as evidenced by their opponents’ average rank of 392.92, compared to Crawley's 433.56.
- In deciding sets, Sieg has a 55% success rate, notably higher than Crawley’s 43%, which could be pivotal in close matches.
- Crawley slightly outperforms Sieg in converting breakpoints, with a 40.17% success rate compared to Sieg’s 37.65%.
Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):
Both players have their areas of strength and weakness, with Sieg showing a marginal edge on second serve performance while Crawley excels in returning serves, especially second ones. These insights suggest potential advantages in certain match phases.
Crawley boasts a higher overall win percentage over the past year and performs significantly better on hard courts. Additionally, her experience against marginally lower-ranked opponents may suggest strategic advantages.
Sieg, however, stands out in deciding sets, an element that might prove decisive if the match becomes tightly contested. Despite these strengths, Crawley's superior record on critical statistical metrics and win percentage suggests a higher likelihood of victory.
Based on current and historical data and performance, Crawley emerges as the likely winner for the upcoming match.
Fiona Crawley vs Madison Sieg Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Crawley vs M. Sieg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:24:8 | Average Match Time | 2:24:8 |
| 60% (49/82) | 1st Serve % | 65% (43/66) |
| 51% (25/49) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (26/43) |
| 64% (21/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (13/23) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 63% (5/8) |
| 41% (27/66) | Return Points Win % | 44% (36/82) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Crawley Recent Matches Played
M. Sieg Recent Matches Played

F. Crawley vs M. Sieg Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.48% (83/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.30% (121/106) |
| 63.07% (181/106) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.56% (264/248) |
| 55.39% (1439/1159) | Games Win/Loss | 50.39% (2319/2283) |
| 71.43% (65/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.17% (67/59) |
| 43.75% (7/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.75% (43/37) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.38% (11/10) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 91 | Aces Total | 255 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 342 | Total Double Faults | 775 |
| 1:37:58 | Average Match Time | 1:43:11 |
| 411.19 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.79 |
| 66% (4798/7297) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8779/13996) |
| 60% (2877/4798) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (5209/8779) |
| 45% (1125/2499) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2341/5217) |
| 51% (519/1019) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (891/1844) |
| 49% (3586/7337) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6622/14334) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 66.33% (65/33) | Challenger W/L | 51.30% (99/94) |
| 77.78% (14/4) | Futures W/L | 68.75% (22/10) |
| 67% (83/123) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (118/222) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (20/35) |
| 63% (26/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (36/59) |
| 92% (76/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (115/103) |
| 8% (76/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (115/12) |
| 28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (112/18) |